Re: Windows Build System was: Win32 port patches
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Windows Build System was: Win32 port patches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1043257786.17127.45.camel@huli обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Windows Build System was: Win32 port patches submitted ("Curtis Faith" <curtis@galtair.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Windows Build System
Re: Windows Build System was: Win32 port patches Re: Windows Build System Re: Windows Build System Re: Windows Build System was: Win32 port patches |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 15:34, Curtis Faith wrote: > tom lane writes: > > You think we should drive away our existing unix developers > > in the mere hope of attracting windows developers? Sorry, it > > isn't going to happen. > > Tom brings up a good point, that changes to support Windows should not > add to the tasks of those who are doing the bulk of the work on Unixen. > > I don't think, however, that this necessarily means that having Windows > developers use Cygwin is the right solution. We need to come up with a > way to support Windows Visual C++ projects without adding work to the > other developers. Does anyone know how MySQL and interbase/firebird do it ? > POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS: > > The Visual C++ Workspaces and Projects files are actually text files > that have a defined format. I don't think the format is published but it > looks pretty easy to figure out. will probably change between releases (also I dont think you can easily compile C source on a C# compiler) ;/ -- Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: