Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4?
| От | Neil Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1042998754.351.613.camel@tokyo обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4? (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 22:47, Justin Clift wrote: > Over the last few days we've had patches submitted for 7.2.3 that > address a couple of things, both the WAL Recovery Bug that Tom has > developed a patch for, and a couple of buffer overflows that have been > widely reported. The buffer overflows, IMHO, are not sufficient reason to release an update. As Tom pointed out, there are lots of other, unpatched overflows in 7.2.3 (and the whole class of vulnerability requires SQL access to begin with). As for the "WAL recovery bug", AFAIK no such bug has been reported "in the last few days". Exactly what issue are you referring to? Cheers, Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: