Re: max_fsm_pages Sanity Check
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: max_fsm_pages Sanity Check |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1041606161.1983.59.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: max_fsm_pages Sanity Check (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 09:44, Robert Treat wrote: > relations determines > the total number of "objects" the database is willing to pay attention > to. The default is set to 100, which means if you have more than 100 > tables/indicies in your database, vacuum might ignore some tables that > are being updated. Theres no rule on how it picks which tables it pays > attention to (my guess is that its a first come first served thing, but > thats just a guess) but given that there are around 90 system "objects" > it's not hard to imagine that some things get left behind. You probably > need this set to at least 610, though fwiw the default on this was > recently bumped up to 1000 for future versions. > Just to correct myself, the entries used in max_fsm_relations are tables and toast (not indexes) , of which there are 37 system tables taking up FSM entries. You can get a more accurate count of your need by doing select count(*) from pg_class where relkind in ('r','t'); in each database in your cluster. Robert Treat
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: