Re: updatable (J2EE) resultsets
От | Daniel Serodio |
---|---|
Тема | Re: updatable (J2EE) resultsets |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1040754195.16251.12.camel@kelly обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: updatable (J2EE) resultsets (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: updatable (J2EE) resultsets
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Tue, 2002-12-24 at 15:57, Kris Jurka wrote: > > On 23 Dec 2002, Dave Cramer wrote: > > > BTW, I only apply to the HEAD, we have never patched to the current > > version. Barry and I have talked about it recently, obviously you think > > this is "abnormal". What are your opinions about it? > > > > This means that the driver we ship with 7.3.0 will be exactly the same as > 7.3.1 and 7.3.2 and so on. The .0 release of the server and the driver > will generally bring about the discovery of bugs in both. The server bugs > are fixed and a new release is put out .1, but the driver bugs are only > fixed in HEAD and our only advice is to run a driver from CVS head. This > is something our users don't want to do because it requires a cvs checkout > and running untested code. I think the policy for the driver should match > that for the server: new features go into HEAD while bug fixes go into > both the stable and development branches. > > Kris Jurka I vote for backporting bugfixes to the stable branch, like Debian Stable does. -- []'s Daniel Serodio
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: