Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?
Дата
Msg-id 10362.1160664260@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
Ответы Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?  (Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>)
Список pgsql-performance
"Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net> writes:
> If someone's going to commit to putting effort into improving the
> planner then that's wonderful. But I can't recall any significant
> planner improvements since min/max (which I'd argue was more of a bug
> fix than an improvement).

Hmph.  Apparently I've wasted most of the last five years.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?
Следующее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Hints proposal