Re: Dirty Buffer Writing [was Proposed LogWriter Scheme]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Copeland
Тема Re: Dirty Buffer Writing [was Proposed LogWriter Scheme]
Дата
Msg-id 1034088918.14350.279.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Dirty Buffer Writing [was Proposed LogWriter Scheme]  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce,

Is there remarks along these lines in the performance turning section of
the docs?  Based on what's coming out of this it would seem that
stressing the importance of leaving a notable (rule of thumb here?)
amount for general OS/kernel needs is pretty important.


Greg


On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 09:50, Tom Lane wrote:
> (This is, BTW, one of the reasons for discouraging people from pushing
> Postgres' shared buffer cache up to a large fraction of total RAM;
> starving the kernel of disk buffers is just plain not a good idea.)


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Dirty Buffer Writing [was Proposed LogWriter Scheme]
Следующее
От: "Curtis Faith"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes