Re: Temporary Views
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Temporary Views |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1029252168.74400.53.camel@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Temporary Views (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Temporary Views
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 11:18, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> writes: > > > I'm thinking that temporary views should be pretty trivial to > > > implement. > > > > ... except not so trivial, per the rest of your note. > > > > Do we actually need any such feature? Views on temp tables already work > > correctly in CVS tip: the implicit DROP CASCADE on temp tables at > > backend exit makes such views go 'way too. > > Oh. but RESTRICT is the default. Seems like the view should go away no > matter what, and if they mix temp and non-temp tables, is it obvious > that the view will disappear if they didn't specify TEMP on view > creation. When the backend exits the code that removes temp tables is CASCADE by default and anything depending on it will disappear.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: