Re: Should enum GUCs be listed as such in config.sgml?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Should enum GUCs be listed as such in config.sgml? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 10075.1227290611@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Should enum GUCs be listed as such in config.sgml? (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Should enum GUCs be listed as such in config.sgml?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Last I checked, Magnus had promised to come up with suitable
>> documentation changes for this patch, but then he went off sailing...
> Meh, I seem to have forgotten this one again. Here's a suggestion, seems
> ok, or were you thinking about something more?
Needs a bit of proofreading but this is more or less what I had in
mind.
> + Enum settings are specified the same way as string settings, but they
> + are limited in which strings are accepted. For each setting the available
> + are listed in <literal>pg_settings.enumvals</>.
IIRC the comparisons are case-insensitive; if so the fact should be
mentioned here.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: