I've been working with PostgreSQL on OS X (G4, G5 and dual G5 systems)
for a few months now, and overall I've been really pleased; for us, it
seems to be a good match.
If you have both an OS X and a Linux or BSD system available, you could
run pgbench against both and get a rough idea on how they compare.
On Nov 4, 2004, at 1:33 PM, William Yu wrote:
> My guess is that you will get better performance from a similarly
> priced Dual Opteron for the following reasons:
>
> 1) OS-X is not 64-bit yet, 64-bit Linux/BSD OS's are available
> 2) GCC is far better tuned for x86 than PowerPC/Itanium/etc
> 3) Postgres *seems* to prefer Opteron's ondie memory controller
> architecture over shared bus -- especially in SMP configs
>
> Is it enough of a difference? If you needed to eek out every possible
> % performance because you have a critical production need, then the
> answer is yes. Otherwise, it's easier to stick with the OS you know.
>
>
> Jim Strickland wrote:
>> Well, the whole reason I have asked this question is because my
>> developer swears by OS X and PostgreSQL. However, I wanted opinions
>> from other people who have possibly used a similar setup so I can
>> make an informed decision. I will certainly keep your advice in mind.
>> I guess the only reason I was asking about the version of OS X and
>> the G5 processor, is because that is all my developer uses and he
>> seems to think they make a great combination, but that seems to be at
>> odds with your experience.
>> Perhaps some others will weigh in with their experiences and I will
>> be able to make a sound decision. Fortunately there is no great rush
>> to decide. Thanks for your help.
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
> majordomo@postgresql.org
>