Re: [HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect toalternative hosts when some errors occur
От | Tsunakawa, Takayuki |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect toalternative hosts when some errors occur |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F7BB500@G01JPEXMBYT05 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts whensome errors occur (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect toalternative hosts when some errors occur
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Tom, Michael, Robert, Noah From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Robert Haas > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki > <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > Sorry again, but how can we handle this? A non-PG-developer, Tels (and > possibly someone else, IIRC) claimed that the behavior be changed during > the beta period. Why should we do nothing? > > Because we do not have consensus on changing it. I've decided that you're > right, but several other people are saying "no". I can't just go change > it in the face of objections. How are things decided in cases like this? Does the RMT team usually do some kind of poll? So far, there are four proponents (Tels (non-PG-developer), David J., Robert and me), and two opponents (Tom and Michael). Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: