[HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts whensome errors occur
От | Tsunakawa, Takayuki |
---|---|
Тема | [HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts whensome errors occur |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F7B9851@G01JPEXMBYT05 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts whensome errors occur (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
[HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts whensome errors occur
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, Robert, Noah From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmhaas@gmail.com] > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > > We've reached that period. If anyone is going to push for a change > > here, now is the time. Absent such arguments, the behavior won't change. > > Well, I started out believing that the current behavior was for the best, > and then completely reversed my position and favored the OP's proposal. > Nothing has really happened since then to change my mind, so I guess I'm > still in that camp. But do we have any new data points? Have any > beta-testers tested this and what do they think? > The only non-developer (i.e. person not living in an ivory tower) who has > weighed in here is Tels, who favored reversing the original decision and > adopting Tsunakawa-san's position, and that was 2 months ago. > > I am pretty reluctant to tinker with this at this late date and in the face > of several opposing votes, but I do think that we bet on the wrong horse. Sorry again, but how can we handle this? A non-PG-developer, Tels (and possibly someone else, IIRC) claimed that the behaviorbe changed during the beta period. Why should we do nothing? Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: