Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Nasby
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal
Дата
Msg-id 091c037a-3210-2898-5449-e3176885290a@BlueTreble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal  (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 12/22/16 4:20 AM, amul sul wrote:
> • pg_background_detach : This API takes the process id and detach the
> background process. Stored worker's session is not dropped until this
> called.

When I hear "detach" I think that whatever I'm detaching from is going 
to stick around, which I don't think is the case here, right? I'd 
suggest pg_background_close() instead.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Potential data loss of 2PC files
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [BUG?] pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands() error withALTER TEXT SEARCH CONFIGURATION