[PERFORM] why we do not create indexes on master
| От | Valerii Valeev |
|---|---|
| Тема | [PERFORM] why we do not create indexes on master |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 01F901FD-F29D-4A46-ACB4-4E6FD75EE7E6@mail.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: [PERFORM] why we do not create indexes on master
Re: [PERFORM] why we do not create indexes on master |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Dear colleagues,
can anyone please explain, why we do not create indexes on master?
In my case master / child design blindly follows partitioning guide https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/ddl-partitioning.html.
My collaborator was unhappy with performance of queries over master table with filtering by one of fields
SELECT * FROM “master" WHERE “field" BETWEEN x AND y
(there are indexes for “field” on child tables).
He has created index on master once and found that the query returns 100x faster.
I have naive idea that it won’t help if index is created before the data is there — i.e. indexes on master aren’t updated when data loaded to child table.
I’m curious is it right or it’s something less primitive.
Thanks and have a happy holidays!
Val.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: