Re: Performance decrease
От | Radovan Antloga |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance decrease |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 015801c66494$ee3d25c0$1e4ba8c0@AR6 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Performance decrease ("Radovan Antloga" <radovan.antloga@siol.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance decrease
Re: Performance decrease |
Список | pgsql-performance |
>190 fields in a table seems like rather a lot ... is that actually >representative of your intended applications? Test table is like table I use in production with Firebird and Oracle db. Table has a lot of smallint and integer fields. As you can see I have Firebird for low cost projects (small companies) and Oracle medium or large project. >Again, is that representative of something you'll be doing a lot in >practice? Most apps don't often update every row of a table, in my >experience. I agree with you ! I have once or twice a month update on many records (~6000) but not so many. I did not expect PG would have problems with updating 15800 records. My test was on Windows XP SP2. I have AMD 64 2.1 GHz cpu with 1GB ram. Regards, Radovan Antloga
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: