Re: Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0.
От | Lamar Owen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 01032019304006.14753@lowen обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > This will not be RC1 :-( > 'Ive already gotten a > couple occurrences of Lamar's failure. Well, I was at least hoping it was a problem here -- particularly since I haven't been able to reproduce it. But, since it is not a local problem, I'm glad I caught it -- on the first regression test run, no less. I've run a dozen tests since without duplication. Although, like you, Tom, I'm curious as to why it hadn't showed up before -- is the fact that this is a slow machine a factor, possibly? Although I am now much more leery of our regression suite -- this issue isn't even tested, in reality. Do we have _any_ WAL-related tests? The parallel testing is a good thing -- but I wonder what boundary conditions aren't getting tested. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: