-----Original Message-----
From: "Marc G. Fournier"<scrappy@postgresql.org>
Sent: 19/09/05 16:56:23
To: "Tom Lane"<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Marc G. Fournier"<scrappy@postgresql.org>, "Magnus Hagander"<mha@sollentuna.net>, "Andreas
Pflug"<pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>,"Dave Page"<dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>,
"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org"<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Wrap Up ...
> +1 on reverting them back then ... and on
> a quick beta3 (ie. by end of week?)
+1 from me as well.
/D
-----Unmodified Original Message-----
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
>> Is there a reason the old/new can't be aliaseed to each other, instead of
>> the old just being removed?
>
> Any change like that would require another initdb. If we were going to
> force another initdb, my vote would be to revert these functions to
> where they were in beta1. It was a mistake to change them in such a
> hurry.
+1 on reverting them back then ... and on a quick beta3 (ie. by end of
week?)
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664