On Mon, 2005-19-09 at 10:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Any change like that would require another initdb. If we were going to
> force another initdb, my vote would be to revert these functions to
> where they were in beta1.
What purpose would that serve? About the only thing purpose I can see is
to avoid the API compatibility break for pg_cancel_backend() -- do
people actually consider that a major issue?
At any rate, I don't see any reason to revert the other changes (i.e.
those other than pg_cancel_backend()).
-Neil