Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems

Makes it more fun :)  Kinda like a lottery ticket:

- reliable (cherry)
- fast (cherry)
- resource hog (lemon)
--
Rod Taylor  BarChord Entertainment Inc.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: "Martín Marqués" <martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar>
Cc: "Trond Eivind Glomsrød" <teg@redhat.com>;
<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems


> > I'm concearned about this because we are going to switch our
> > fist server to a Journaling FS (on Linux).  Searching and asking
> > I found out that for our short term work we need ReiserFS (it's
> > for a proxy server).  Put the interesting thing was that for
> > large (very large) files, everybody recomends XFS.  The drawback
> > of XFS is that it's very, very sloooow when deleting files.
>
> Why do all these file systems seem to have one major negative?
>
> --
>   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
>   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>