Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table
| От | Rémi Lapeyre | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 00B5FD97-A568-4270-B0CF-59BA7DEEBFEA@lenstra.fr обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table (Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
Hi, thanks for working on this. I had planned to work on it and I’m looking forward to this natively in Postgres.
The patch builds with the following warnings:
plancat.c:2368:18: warning: variable 'name' is used uninitialized whenever 'for' loop exits because its condition is
false[-Wsometimes-uninitialized] 
        for (int i = 0; i < natts; i++)
                        ^~~~~~~~~
plancat.c:2379:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here
        return name;
               ^~~~
plancat.c:2368:18: note: remove the condition if it is always true
        for (int i = 0; i < natts; i++)
                        ^~~~~~~~~
plancat.c:2363:15: note: initialize the variable 'name' to silence this warning
        char       *name;
                        ^
                         = NULL
plancat.c:2396:18: warning: variable 'name' is used uninitialized whenever 'for' loop exits because its condition is
false[-Wsometimes-uninitialized] 
        for (int i = 0; i < natts; i++)
                        ^~~~~~~~~
plancat.c:2407:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here
        return name;
               ^~~~
plancat.c:2396:18: note: remove the condition if it is always true
        for (int i = 0; i < natts; i++)
                        ^~~~~~~~~
plancat.c:2391:15: note: initialize the variable 'name' to silence this warning
        char       *name;
                        ^
                         = NULL
2 warnings generated.
make check pass without issues, but make check-world fails for postgres_fdw, the diff is attached.
Before going further in the review, I’m a bit surprised by the quantity of code needed here. In
https://github.com/xocolatl/periodsthere is far less code and I would have expected the same here. For example, are the
changesto copy necessary or would it be possible to have a first patch the only implement the minimal changes required
forthis feature? 
Thanks a lot!
Rémi
		
	Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: