Re: Metadata
От | |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Metadata |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 009801c3304b$242152f0$1401010a@Xeon обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Metadata ("Bovard Yves (DIP)" <Yves.Bovard@heg.ge.ch>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Hello, Currently I am focused basically on the same issues: 1). I hope yes, I see no reason to change it. 2). You may want to take a look at: http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/features.html SQL1999 is just another name for SQL3. Anyway it's not trivail task to compare SQL3 and PostgreSQL. As far as I know there are NO SQL3 conformance tests. I infer, without conformance testing is impossible to make statements like 'our DBVS supports (conforms with) SQL3'. I would be happy to get postgres developer comments on this issue, (me feels small & humble ;-). Regards, Alvis Tunkelis ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bovard Yves (DIP)" <Yves.Bovard@heg.ge.ch> To: <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:38 PM Subject: [ADMIN] Metadata Dear Sir I am a swiss student in the University of Applied Sciences of Geneva. For a report on the different implantation of metadata in PostgreSQL 7.3, Oracle and SQL3, I would like you to know if it is possible to answer me some questions : 1) is the system catalog the only one way to have metadata? 2) what are the main differences between PostgreSQL 7.3 and Oracle 9i and between PostgreSQL 7.3 and SQL3? I would be very pleased if you answer these questions before friday. Your sincerely Yves Bovard HEG-Genève Département Informatique de Gestion ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: