Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mattias Kregert
Тема Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images
Дата
Msg-id 005d01c42163$5225bba0$09000a0a@kregert.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Filesystem vs. Postgres for images  (Michal Hlavac <hlavki@medium13.sk>)
Список pgsql-general
> Hi,
>
> > imho other filesystems like reiser have some version-problems ;)
>
> Oh please. Reiser is as unstable as postgres is slow - in other words, both
> have to suffer prejudice which used to be true loooong ago. ;-)
>
> In cases of large directories ext2/3 perform extremely bad (as in the original
> post) So this guy will be better off with anything but ext2/3. That's why I
> switched from ext2 to reiser ~2 years ago (without any problems since).
>
> Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards
> Holger Klawitter
> - --

I use reiserfs, too. Large directories (hundreds of thousand files) does not slow down file retrival, and i never had
anyproblems with stability. 

/Mattias


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Anton Nikiforov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: verifying unicode locale support