Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications?
От | K.Tao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 005b01bf3510$77632b80$040101c0@p2400arcane обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications? (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Well I do apologize as all my experiences are in the use of pre 6.5 versions...I assume there have no longer been any reports of databases having to be rebuilt or restored from tape from the way you are talking ;) Although I still feel that the level of expertise for an admin on a Unix platform running PostgreSQL is much higher than lets say Oracle on NT. One example is if you cancel out of a admin process like vacuum while in pgsql. U have to have enough exp to know what files to go and delete to be able to get pgsql back up and running. I do think that the commercial support program moves PostgreSQL much closer to being a database I would choose. I havent had the requirement for that support, but I am sure if I had a large system utilizing PostgreSQL I would not hesitate to pay to make sure 24x7 I can get the database back up and runniog within 15 mins of it going down :) I also do like the sound of getting rid of vacuum and its table locks. Anythng to make the database more self administering and self recovering is good ;) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: