I'm just coming at this from the point of view of someone who's
implementing PostgreSQL for the first time, but has in-depth
Oracle experience. This is the one area left where organisations
are going to discount PostgreSQL because they can't afford to
tell people that all data entered that day has to be re-entered
(sorry) because of a database corruption. How slick it is
doesn't matter initially, as long as it can reliably be done.
Andy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@eldocomp.com>
Cc: "Andy Marden" <amarden@usa.net>;
<pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:12 AM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Recovery - transaction logs
> Chad R. Larson wrote:
> > At 06:59 AM 2/6/02 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >Yes, we need point-in-time recovery. We don't have that
yet. It is on
> > >the TODO list.
> >
> > How's the status on that? Around a year ago, it was
predicted to be in
> > 7.1.3, or 7.2 at the latest. How now?
>
> No one has worked on it. Sorry.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian |
http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania 19026
>