RE: select locks table for updates
| От | Michel SALAIS |
|---|---|
| Тема | RE: select locks table for updates |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 003601d6bec3$cc0db980$64292c80$@msym.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: select locks table for updates (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-admin |
I think the original question wasn't about what can be done. Any way that is how I considered it. A simple question, a simplereply taking into account default behavior only. The point was just to say that things don't go the same everywhere... Michel SALAIS -----Message d'origine----- De : Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> Envoyé : jeudi 19 novembre 2020 22:14 À : Michel SALAIS <msalais@msym.fr> Cc : Yambu <hyambu@gmail.com>; Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org> Objet : Re: select locks table for updates On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 10:20, Michel SALAIS <msalais@msym.fr> wrote: > > No! Not in PostgreSQL. In normal SELECTs, that is correct. If you use SELECT ... FOR UPDATE then rows will be locked. -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: