"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Mendola Gaetano" <mendola@bigfoot.com> writes:
> > "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> >> Nope. I don't know how John got into this state, but it most
definitely
> >> was not that way. Try it.
>
> > Here it his:
>
> No, you're looking at the result of psql -l. What John was showing us
> was the actual contents of pg_database, which would still contain a
> numeric datdba value after your example.
>
> regards, tom lane
You're right ( like usual :-) )
but you agree anyway that should not possible delete
a user that own DB object or at least change the owner
to postgres?
Regards
Gaetano Mendola