Re: Public vs internal APIs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Markus KARG
Тема Re: Public vs internal APIs
Дата
Msg-id 002c01d0c570$0cd3f1d0$267bd570$@eu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Public vs internal APIs  (Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Public vs internal APIs  (Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-jdbc
Well, yes, I also don't think that it would work well in the long term. But we could go with the ".internal" subpackage
forexample. 

On the other hand I wonder wether the risk of using internal stuff really exists. I mean, people shall code against
java.*API, not against org.postgresql implementation. If we make this clear in the JavaDocs, maybe it is enough? 

-----Original Message-----
From: Vladimir Sitnikov [mailto:sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Juli 2015 19:12
To: Markus KARG
Cc: List
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Public vs internal APIs

Any hint to the project that successfully uses "all stuff in a single
java package" approach?

I'm afraid that is too tight.

For instance, RxJava mixes "annotations and internal package"
approach: https://github.com/ReactiveX/RxJava#versioning

Vladimir



В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Vladimir Sitnikov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Public vs internal APIs
Следующее
От: Vladimir Sitnikov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Public vs internal APIs