Re: Public vs internal APIs
От | Markus KARG |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Public vs internal APIs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 002c01d0c570$0cd3f1d0$267bd570$@eu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Public vs internal APIs (Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Public vs internal APIs
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Well, yes, I also don't think that it would work well in the long term. But we could go with the ".internal" subpackage forexample. On the other hand I wonder wether the risk of using internal stuff really exists. I mean, people shall code against java.*API, not against org.postgresql implementation. If we make this clear in the JavaDocs, maybe it is enough? -----Original Message----- From: Vladimir Sitnikov [mailto:sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Juli 2015 19:12 To: Markus KARG Cc: List Subject: Re: [JDBC] Public vs internal APIs Any hint to the project that successfully uses "all stuff in a single java package" approach? I'm afraid that is too tight. For instance, RxJava mixes "annotations and internal package" approach: https://github.com/ReactiveX/RxJava#versioning Vladimir
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: