Re: Ridicolus Postgresql review
От | Mitch Vincent |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Ridicolus Postgresql review |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 001101c13afc$799593e0$1e51000a@mitch обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Ridicolus Postgresql review (Shaun Thomas <sthomas@townnews.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
It seems that the argument is over what a "stored procedure" is.... So can anyone answer that with something to back it up? Opinions are great and all but I think something more substantial than the "just 'cause" reason is needed here :-) Thanks! -Mitch > I blame the author. > > But as far as the comments on this list, the main differentiation > between stored procedures and functions (as commonly accepted in the > database world) was that stored procedures can return result sets and > can be associated in packages, functions do not have this distinction. > > That said, postgres has functions, not stored procedures. Personally, > I wish postgres *did* have stored procedures... I like them far better. > > -- > +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ > | Shaun M. Thomas INN Database Programmer | > | Phone: (309) 743-0812 Fax : (309) 743-0830 | > | Email: sthomas@townnews.com AIM : trifthen | > | Web : hamster.lee.net | > | | > | "Most of our lives are about proving something, either to | > | ourselves or to someone else." | > | -- Anonymous | > +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: