Re: Pooled Connections (was Connections with Tomcat 3.2.4 and PostgreSQL 7.1.3)
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pooled Connections (was Connections with Tomcat 3.2.4 and PostgreSQL 7.1.3) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 000e01c1c53e$eb3ea500$c201a8c0@inspiron обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pooled Connections (was Connections with Tomcat 3.2.4 and PostgreSQL 7.1.3) (<tsmets@brutele.be>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
I think you will find that you can leave the password out now, and updating to the latest driver may improve the first problem too Dave -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of tsmets@brutele.be Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 10:51 AM To: Doug Fields; pgsql jdbc Subject: Re: [JDBC] Pooled Connections (was Connections with Tomcat 3.2.4 and PostgreSQL 7.1.3) JBoss docs mentions that the 7.x driver jdbc7.0-1.2.jar is causing troubles with: <quote> Extreme Java "long" values will cause SQLExceptions and may corrupt the driver so that further actions will fail. </quote> A bit further they mention : <quote> You must include a User name and password. They can be bogus if your PostgreSQL in to trust the machine you are coming from, but you cannot leave them out. </quote> Rgds, THomas, -- Thomas SMETS rue J. Wytsmanstraat 62 1050 Bruxelles yahoo-id: smetsthomas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Fields" <dfields-postgres@pexicom.com> To: <Dave@micro-automation.net> Cc: "'Justin Clift'" <justin@postgresql.org>; <tsmets@brutele.be>; "'pgsql jdbc'" <pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org>; <hyellina@iprimus.com.au> Sent: 06 March, 2002 4:27 PM Subject: Re: [JDBC] Pooled Connections (was Connections with Tomcat 3.2.4 and PostgreSQL 7.1.3) > At 07:30 AM 3/6/2002, Dave Cramer wrote: > >Pooled connections aren't rocket science. There are quite a few > >freely available, poolman for one. > > For what it's worth, I never got Poolman 2.0.4 to work with the JDBC > 7.2 drivers; occasionally and for no reason it would give me spurious > errors on > perfectly good SQL. I posted about it a week or two ago on this list. > I received no replies, and furthermore got no replies from the > author(s) and found little information about it on the net. > > I now use Protomatter (protomatter.sourceforge.net) and have had very > good success with it. It's a more simple implementation, hence, > probably faster and/or more bug free, and the author has been very > talkative and has implemented some enhancements/repairs that I have > suggested/provided. > > Also to back up what Dave said - you never know when and/or even if > the GC is going to collect your connections, so always close them in a > finally block. The beauty of GC is that it's non-deterministic and > allows you to be > sloppy. The horror of GC is that it's non-deterministic and allows you > to be sloppy. > > Cheers, > > Doug > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: