Re: int8 vs text in odbc link
| От | Richard Huxton |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: int8 vs text in odbc link |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 000e01c0374b$6ad51c00$1001a8c0@archonet.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | int8 vs text in odbc link (Andrew Gould <andrewgould@yahoo.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: "Andrew Gould" <andrewgould@yahoo.com> Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2000 9:12 PM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] int8 vs text in odbc link > Andrew Gould <andrewgould@yahoo.com> writes: > > Unfortunately, all of the columns of the data > > type int8 are interpreted as text in MS Access 97 when > > you look at the design view of the table. > > Offhand it looks like our ODBC driver will report the type of an int8 > field as "SQL_BIGINT" (-5), which may or may not be a standard ODBC > type code --- and even if it is, Access might not know it. Anybody > know? > Access 97 has Integer as 16-bit and Long Integer as 32-bit - those are the only options available AFAICT. - Richard Huxton
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: