Re: Any risk in increasing BLCKSZ to get larger tuples?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Steve Wolfe
Тема Re: Any risk in increasing BLCKSZ to get larger tuples?
Дата
Msg-id 000901c03a0b$f2015a00$50824e40@iboats.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Any risk in increasing BLCKSZ to get larger tuples?  (Philip Hallstrom <philip@adhesivemedia.com>)
Список pgsql-general
> > A trick you can use in 7.0.* to squeeze out a little more space is
> > to declare your large text fields as "lztext" --- this invokes
> > inline compression, which might get you a factor of 2 or so on typical
> > mail messages.  lztext will go away again in 7.1, since TOAST supersedes
> > it,
>
> Uh, why.  Does TOAST do automatic compression?  If people need to store
> huge blocks of text (like a DNA sequence) inline compression isn't just
> a hack to squeeze bigger text into a tuple.

  I'd guess that it's a speed issue.  Decompressing everything in the table
for every select sounds like a great waste of CPU power, to me, especially
when hard drives and RAM are cheap.  Kind of like the idea of "drivespace"
on Windows - nice idea, but it slowed things down quite a bit.

steve



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Neil Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Any risk in increasing BLCKSZ to get larger tuples?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: NOTICE-message