RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...'

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hiroshi Inoue
Тема RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...'
Дата
Msg-id 000701bf8342$ebc500e0$2801007e@tpf.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...'  ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
> [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org]On Behalf Of Hiroshi Inoue
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 11:06 AM
> To: The Hermit Hacker
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...'
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> > [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of The Hermit
> > Hacker
> > 
> > 
> > Can someone look into this, and followup with Don? :)
> >
> 
> Currently utility commands aren't executable in PL/pgSQL.
> In short,it's due the lack of implementation of copyObject()
> for UtilityStatements.
> However,there's another essential problem.
> 
> PL/pgSQL caches prepared plans for fucntions at their
> first execution time. Though many oids/numbers ... exist
> in the cached plans,they are changed by DML statements                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Oops sorry,DDL not DML statement.

> and cached plans would become invalid. Currently once
> a plan is cached,it stays in TopMemoryContext forever
> and would never be removed/changed.
> 



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] minor bug in 7.0: casting
Следующее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh