Обсуждение: Avoid resource leak (contrib/postgres_fdw/connection.c)
Hi.
Per Coverity.
CID 1645716: (#1 of 1): Resource leak (RESOURCE_LEAK)
8. leaked_storage: Variable str going out of scope leaks the storage str.data points to.The function *postgres_fdw_connection* leaks the contents of
var str.data
Once that function *cstring_to_text* palloc the contents
must be necessary to free the var str.data.
patch attached.
best regards,
Ranier Vilelas
Вложения
On 16/03/26 08:45, Ranier Vilela wrote: > Hi. > > Per Coverity. > > CID 1645716: (#1 of 1): Resource leak (RESOURCE_LEAK) > 8. leaked_storage: Variable str going out of scope leaks the storage > str.data points to. > > The function *postgres_fdw_connection* leaks the contents of > var str.data > Once that function *cstring_to_text* palloc the contents > must be necessary to free the var str.data. > > patch attached. > Hi, Thanks for the patch, it looks correct to me. I've searched for this pattern `PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(cstring_to_text(.*.data` in other places and I've just found on postgres_fdw/connection.c I've also search for other cases of `return cstring_to_text(...)` usages and I didn't found anything that seems suspicious. Tests are also passing. -- Matheus Alcantara EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
Hi.
Em seg., 16 de mar. de 2026 às 11:16, Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com> escreveu:
On 16/03/26 08:45, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Per Coverity.
>
> CID 1645716: (#1 of 1): Resource leak (RESOURCE_LEAK)
> 8. leaked_storage: Variable str going out of scope leaks the storage
> str.data points to.
>
> The function *postgres_fdw_connection* leaks the contents of
> var str.data
> Once that function *cstring_to_text* palloc the contents
> must be necessary to free the var str.data.
>
> patch attached.
>
Hi,
Thanks for the patch, it looks correct to me. I've searched for this
pattern `PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(cstring_to_text(.*.data` in other places and
I've just found on postgres_fdw/connection.c
I've also search for other cases of `return cstring_to_text(...)`
usages and I didn't found anything that seems suspicious.
Tests are also passing.
Thanks for taking a look.
best regards,
Ranier Vilela
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 8:46 PM Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi. > > Per Coverity. > > CID 1645716: (#1 of 1): Resource leak (RESOURCE_LEAK) > 8. leaked_storage: Variable str going out of scope leaks the storage str.data points to. > > The function *postgres_fdw_connection* leaks the contents of > var str.data > Once that function *cstring_to_text* palloc the contents > must be necessary to free the var str.data. It seems that postgres_fdw_connection() is expected to be called by ForeignServerConnectionString() via OidFunctionCall3(), and to allocate memory (including str.data) in the FDWConnectionContext memory context created by ForeignServerConnectionString(). After calling postgres_fdw_connection(), ForeignServerConnectionString() deletes FDWConnectionContext. So it seems to me that any memory allocated in that context, including str.data, would not leak. No? Regards, -- Fujii Masao
On 16/03/26 20:07, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 8:46 PM Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Per Coverity.
>>
>> CID 1645716: (#1 of 1): Resource leak (RESOURCE_LEAK)
>> 8. leaked_storage: Variable str going out of scope leaks the storage str.data points to.
>>
>> The function *postgres_fdw_connection* leaks the contents of
>> var str.data
>> Once that function *cstring_to_text* palloc the contents
>> must be necessary to free the var str.data.
>
> It seems that postgres_fdw_connection() is expected to be called by
> ForeignServerConnectionString() via OidFunctionCall3(),
> and to allocate memory (including str.data) in the FDWConnectionContext
> memory context created by ForeignServerConnectionString().
>
> After calling postgres_fdw_connection(), ForeignServerConnectionString()
> deletes FDWConnectionContext. So it seems to me that any memory
> allocated in that context, including str.data, would not leak. No?
>
Yeah, this sounds correct, but I'm wondering if the current pfree
calls on postgres_fdw_connection() is needed?
My previous review was assuming that any allocated memory on
postgres_fdw_connection() should be free at the end because of these
calls, but ForeignServerConnectionString() already assume that this
function leak memory:
/*
* GetForeignServer, GetForeignDataWrapper, and the connection function
* itself all leak memory into CurrentMemoryContext. Switch to a temporary
* context for easy cleanup.
*/
tempContext = AllocSetContextCreate(CurrentMemoryContext,
"FDWConnectionContext",
ALLOCSET_SMALL_SIZES);
--
Matheus Alcantara
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com