Обсуждение: Passing mac-addresses by value?

Hi,

Mac-addresses are passed by reference. Now when Datums are always
64-bit values we can pass them by value, similarly to Timestamp[Tz].
Are there any concears in respect of change like this e.g. backward
comativility etc?

If not I would like to propose a corresponding path, probably for PG20.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

> Mac-addresses are passed by reference. Now when Datums are always
> 64-bit values we can pass them by value, similarly to Timestamp[Tz].
> Are there any concears in respect of change like this e.g. backward
> comativility etc?
>
> If not I would like to propose a corresponding path, probably for PG20.

Apologies for the typos. My dyslexia seems to be more pronounced today
than usual :D

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@tigerdata.com> writes:
> Mac-addresses are passed by reference. Now when Datums are always
> 64-bit values we can pass them by value, similarly to Timestamp[Tz].
> Are there any concears in respect of change like this e.g. backward
> comativility etc?

To pass standard macaddr (6 bytes) by value, we would have to add
tuple pack/unpack code paths to the existing ones for 1/2/4/8 bytes.
I can't see that that's justified.  We could convert macaddr8 to be
pass-by-value without such global effects, but it looks like it
would still require wholesale changes to the macaddr8-processing
functions.  On the whole I'm doubtful that there's enough gain there
to be worth the work.

            regards, tom lane