Обсуждение: Stmt timeout error can be sent after a CommandComplete

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

Stmt timeout error can be sent after a CommandComplete

От
Anthonin Bonnefoy
Дата:
Hi,

At the end of a command, disable_statement_timeout is called as the
timeout applies to a specific command and a CommandComplete message is
sent.

However, it's possible for the stmt timeout to have been fired between
the last message and the call to disable_statement_timeout. The
timeout won't be active anymore, so disable_timeout will be skipped.
However, the timeout is still queued, and the next call to
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS will process and generate a stmt timeout error.

This leads to the confusing situation where we can have a
CompleteCommand message followed by a stmt timeout error for the same
command.

This patch fixes this issue by resetting the timeout indicator if the
timeout is inactive, relying on get_timeout_indicator to reset the
timeout indicator.

Regards,
Anthonin Bonnefoy

Вложения

Re: Stmt timeout error can be sent after a CommandComplete

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com> writes:
> At the end of a command, disable_statement_timeout is called as the
> timeout applies to a specific command and a CommandComplete message is
> sent.
> However, it's possible for the stmt timeout to have been fired between
> the last message and the call to disable_statement_timeout. The
> timeout won't be active anymore, so disable_timeout will be skipped.
> However, the timeout is still queued, and the next call to
> CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS will process and generate a stmt timeout error.

I think this overlaps the discussion we're having over here:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAGECzQQD5f9ce-D1v6vCTT94hG%3DJbGdTHuf8vQ%3DHBLz9T4dA1g%40mail.gmail.com

I agree that this area is a bit buggy, but I think it's got more
problems than just this.

            regards, tom lane



Re: Stmt timeout error can be sent after a CommandComplete

От
Anthonin Bonnefoy
Дата:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 6:30 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I think this overlaps the discussion we're having over here:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAGECzQQD5f9ce-D1v6vCTT94hG%3DJbGdTHuf8vQ%3DHBLz9T4dA1g%40mail.gmail.com
>
> I agree that this area is a bit buggy, but I think it's got more
> problems than just this.

Yeah, that's definitely the same kind of issue. Thanks for the link, I
will catch up with the thread.