Обсуждение: Fix for recursive plpython triggers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

Fix for recursive plpython triggers

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
This fixes bug #18456 [1].  Since we're in back-branch release freeze,
I'll just park it for the moment.  But I think we should shove it in
once the freeze lifts so it's in 17beta1.

            regards, tom lane

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18456-82d3d70134aefd28%40postgresql.org

diff --git a/src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_trigger.out b/src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_trigger.out
index dd1ca32fa4..4cb90cb520 100644
--- a/src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_trigger.out
+++ b/src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_trigger.out
@@ -618,3 +618,30 @@ SELECT * FROM trigger_test_generated;
 ---+---
 (0 rows)

+-- recursive call of a trigger mustn't corrupt TD (bug #18456)
+CREATE TABLE recursive_trigger_test (a int, b int);
+CREATE FUNCTION recursive_trigger_func() RETURNS trigger
+LANGUAGE plpython3u
+AS $$
+if TD["event"] == "UPDATE":
+    plpy.execute("INSERT INTO recursive_trigger_test VALUES (1, 2)")
+    plpy.notice("TD[event] => " + str(TD["event"]) + ", expecting UPDATE");
+else:
+    plpy.notice("TD[event] => " + str(TD["event"]) + ", expecting INSERT");
+return None
+$$;
+CREATE TRIGGER recursive_trigger_trig
+  AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE ON recursive_trigger_test
+  FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE recursive_trigger_func();
+INSERT INTO recursive_trigger_test VALUES (0, 0);
+NOTICE:  TD[event] => INSERT, expecting INSERT
+UPDATE recursive_trigger_test SET a = 11 WHERE b = 0;
+NOTICE:  TD[event] => INSERT, expecting INSERT
+NOTICE:  TD[event] => UPDATE, expecting UPDATE
+SELECT * FROM recursive_trigger_test;
+ a  | b
+----+---
+ 11 | 0
+  1 | 2
+(2 rows)
+
diff --git a/src/pl/plpython/plpy_exec.c b/src/pl/plpython/plpy_exec.c
index 3145c69699..6f7b5e121d 100644
--- a/src/pl/plpython/plpy_exec.c
+++ b/src/pl/plpython/plpy_exec.c
@@ -335,6 +335,13 @@ PLy_exec_trigger(FunctionCallInfo fcinfo, PLyProcedure *proc)
     PLy_output_setup_tuple(&proc->result, rel_descr, proc);
     PLy_input_setup_tuple(&proc->result_in, rel_descr, proc);

+    /*
+     * If the trigger is called recursively, we must push outer-level
+     * arguments into the stack.  This must be immediately before the PG_TRY
+     * to ensure that the corresponding pop happens.
+     */
+    PLy_global_args_push(proc);
+
     PG_TRY();
     {
         int            rc PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY;
@@ -397,6 +404,7 @@ PLy_exec_trigger(FunctionCallInfo fcinfo, PLyProcedure *proc)
     }
     PG_FINALLY();
     {
+        PLy_global_args_pop(proc);
         Py_XDECREF(plargs);
         Py_XDECREF(plrv);
     }
@@ -501,6 +509,13 @@ PLy_function_save_args(PLyProcedure *proc)
     result->args = PyDict_GetItemString(proc->globals, "args");
     Py_XINCREF(result->args);

+    /* If it's a trigger, also save "TD" */
+    if (proc->is_trigger)
+    {
+        result->td = PyDict_GetItemString(proc->globals, "TD");
+        Py_XINCREF(result->td);
+    }
+
     /* Fetch all the named arguments */
     if (proc->argnames)
     {
@@ -550,6 +565,13 @@ PLy_function_restore_args(PLyProcedure *proc, PLySavedArgs *savedargs)
         Py_DECREF(savedargs->args);
     }

+    /* Restore the "TD" object, too */
+    if (savedargs->td)
+    {
+        PyDict_SetItemString(proc->globals, "TD", savedargs->td);
+        Py_DECREF(savedargs->td);
+    }
+
     /* And free the PLySavedArgs struct */
     pfree(savedargs);
 }
@@ -568,8 +590,9 @@ PLy_function_drop_args(PLySavedArgs *savedargs)
         Py_XDECREF(savedargs->namedargs[i]);
     }

-    /* Drop ref to the "args" object, too */
+    /* Drop refs to the "args" and "TD" objects, too */
     Py_XDECREF(savedargs->args);
+    Py_XDECREF(savedargs->td);

     /* And free the PLySavedArgs struct */
     pfree(savedargs);
@@ -578,9 +601,9 @@ PLy_function_drop_args(PLySavedArgs *savedargs)
 /*
  * Save away any existing arguments for the given procedure, so that we can
  * install new values for a recursive call.  This should be invoked before
- * doing PLy_function_build_args().
+ * doing PLy_function_build_args() or PLy_trigger_build_args().
  *
- * NB: caller must ensure that PLy_global_args_pop gets invoked once, and
+ * NB: callers must ensure that PLy_global_args_pop gets invoked once, and
  * only once, per successful completion of PLy_global_args_push.  Otherwise
  * we'll end up out-of-sync between the actual call stack and the contents
  * of proc->argstack.
diff --git a/src/pl/plpython/plpy_procedure.c b/src/pl/plpython/plpy_procedure.c
index 9cbbe7e3c8..ba7786d31c 100644
--- a/src/pl/plpython/plpy_procedure.c
+++ b/src/pl/plpython/plpy_procedure.c
@@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ PLy_procedure_create(HeapTuple procTup, Oid fn_oid, bool is_trigger)
         proc->fn_readonly = (procStruct->provolatile != PROVOLATILE_VOLATILE);
         proc->is_setof = procStruct->proretset;
         proc->is_procedure = (procStruct->prokind == PROKIND_PROCEDURE);
+        proc->is_trigger = is_trigger;
         proc->src = NULL;
         proc->argnames = NULL;
         proc->args = NULL;
diff --git a/src/pl/plpython/plpy_procedure.h b/src/pl/plpython/plpy_procedure.h
index 8968b5c92e..5db854fc8b 100644
--- a/src/pl/plpython/plpy_procedure.h
+++ b/src/pl/plpython/plpy_procedure.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ typedef struct PLySavedArgs
 {
     struct PLySavedArgs *next;    /* linked-list pointer */
     PyObject   *args;            /* "args" element of globals dict */
+    PyObject   *td;                /* "TD" element of globals dict, if trigger */
     int            nargs;            /* length of namedargs array */
     PyObject   *namedargs[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER];    /* named args */
 } PLySavedArgs;
@@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ typedef struct PLyProcedure
     bool        fn_readonly;
     bool        is_setof;        /* true, if function returns result set */
     bool        is_procedure;
+    bool        is_trigger;        /* called as trigger? */
     PLyObToDatum result;        /* Function result output conversion info */
     PLyDatumToOb result_in;        /* For converting input tuples in a trigger */
     char       *src;            /* textual procedure code, after mangling */
diff --git a/src/pl/plpython/sql/plpython_trigger.sql b/src/pl/plpython/sql/plpython_trigger.sql
index e5504b9ab1..f6c2ef8d6a 100644
--- a/src/pl/plpython/sql/plpython_trigger.sql
+++ b/src/pl/plpython/sql/plpython_trigger.sql
@@ -467,3 +467,27 @@ FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE generated_test_func1();
 TRUNCATE trigger_test_generated;
 INSERT INTO trigger_test_generated (i) VALUES (1);
 SELECT * FROM trigger_test_generated;
+
+
+-- recursive call of a trigger mustn't corrupt TD (bug #18456)
+
+CREATE TABLE recursive_trigger_test (a int, b int);
+
+CREATE FUNCTION recursive_trigger_func() RETURNS trigger
+LANGUAGE plpython3u
+AS $$
+if TD["event"] == "UPDATE":
+    plpy.execute("INSERT INTO recursive_trigger_test VALUES (1, 2)")
+    plpy.notice("TD[event] => " + str(TD["event"]) + ", expecting UPDATE");
+else:
+    plpy.notice("TD[event] => " + str(TD["event"]) + ", expecting INSERT");
+return None
+$$;
+
+CREATE TRIGGER recursive_trigger_trig
+  AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE ON recursive_trigger_test
+  FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE recursive_trigger_func();
+
+INSERT INTO recursive_trigger_test VALUES (0, 0);
+UPDATE recursive_trigger_test SET a = 11 WHERE b = 0;
+SELECT * FROM recursive_trigger_test;

Re: Fix for recursive plpython triggers

От
Andreas Karlsson
Дата:
On 5/4/24 10:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> This fixes bug #18456 [1].  Since we're in back-branch release freeze,
> I'll just park it for the moment.  But I think we should shove it in
> once the freeze lifts so it's in 17beta1.
There is a similar issue with the return type (at least if it is a 
generic record) in the code but it is hard to trigger with sane code so 
I don't know if it is worth fixing but this and the bug Jacques found 
shows the downsides of the hacky fix for recursion that we have in plpython.

I found this issue while reading the code, so am very unclear if there 
is any sane code which could trigger it.

In the example below the recursive call to f('int') changes the return 
type of the f('text') call causing it to fail.

# CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION f(t text) RETURNS record LANGUAGE 
plpython3u AS $$
if t == "text":
     plpy.execute("SELECT * FROM f('int') AS (a int)");
     return { "a": "x" }
elif t == "int":
     return { "a": 1 }
$$;
CREATE FUNCTION

# SELECT * FROM f('text') AS (a text);
ERROR:  invalid input syntax for type integer: "x"
CONTEXT:  while creating return value
PL/Python function "f"

Andreas



Re: Fix for recursive plpython triggers

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> writes:
> I found this issue while reading the code, so am very unclear if there 
> is any sane code which could trigger it.

> In the example below the recursive call to f('int') changes the return 
> type of the f('text') call causing it to fail.

> # CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION f(t text) RETURNS record LANGUAGE 
> plpython3u AS $$
> if t == "text":
>      plpy.execute("SELECT * FROM f('int') AS (a int)");
>      return { "a": "x" }
> elif t == "int":
>      return { "a": 1 }
> $$;
> CREATE FUNCTION

> # SELECT * FROM f('text') AS (a text);
> ERROR:  invalid input syntax for type integer: "x"
> CONTEXT:  while creating return value
> PL/Python function "f"

Oh, nice one.  I think we can fix this trivially though: the problem
is that RECORD return-type setup was stuck into PLy_function_build_args,
where it has no particular business being in the first place, rather
than being done at the point of use.  We can just move the code.

            regards, tom lane

diff --git a/src/pl/plpython/plpy_exec.c b/src/pl/plpython/plpy_exec.c
index 6f7b5e121d..157229e96f 100644
--- a/src/pl/plpython/plpy_exec.c
+++ b/src/pl/plpython/plpy_exec.c
@@ -231,7 +231,23 @@ PLy_exec_function(FunctionCallInfo fcinfo, PLyProcedure *proc)
         }
         else
         {
-            /* Normal conversion of result */
+            /*
+             * Normal conversion of result.  However, if the result is of type
+             * RECORD, we have to set up for that each time through, since it
+             * might be different from last time.
+             */
+            if (proc->result.typoid == RECORDOID)
+            {
+                TupleDesc    desc;
+
+                if (get_call_result_type(fcinfo, NULL, &desc) != TYPEFUNC_COMPOSITE)
+                    ereport(ERROR,
+                            (errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
+                             errmsg("function returning record called in context "
+                                    "that cannot accept type record")));
+                PLy_output_setup_record(&proc->result, desc, proc);
+            }
+
             rv = PLy_output_convert(&proc->result, plrv,
                                     &fcinfo->isnull);
         }
@@ -456,21 +472,6 @@ PLy_function_build_args(FunctionCallInfo fcinfo, PLyProcedure *proc)
                 PLy_elog(ERROR, "PyDict_SetItemString() failed, while setting up arguments");
             arg = NULL;
         }
-
-        /* Set up output conversion for functions returning RECORD */
-        if (proc->result.typoid == RECORDOID)
-        {
-            TupleDesc    desc;
-
-            if (get_call_result_type(fcinfo, NULL, &desc) != TYPEFUNC_COMPOSITE)
-                ereport(ERROR,
-                        (errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
-                         errmsg("function returning record called in context "
-                                "that cannot accept type record")));
-
-            /* cache the output conversion functions */
-            PLy_output_setup_record(&proc->result, desc, proc);
-        }
     }
     PG_CATCH();
     {