Обсуждение: Guarantees/Semantics of pg_stats
Hi,
I'm interested in learning more about the guarantees/semantics of pg_stats. For example, is there a guarantee that the n_distinct and most_common_vals fields will take into account any values appearing more than M times or maybe with frequence more than f? In what cases will n_distinct and most_common_vals will miss some values?
Any pointers to documentation or source code would be greatly appreciated.
Best,
Stefanos
On Sat, 2024-03-02 at 07:41 +0000, Baziotis, Stefanos wrote: > I'm interested in learning more about the guarantees/semantics of pg_stats. > For example, is there a guarantee that the n_distinct and most_common_vals > fields will take into account any values appearing more than M times or > maybe with frequence more than f? In what cases will n_distinct and > most_common_vals will miss some values? Table Statistics are not exact. They are collected from a random sample of the data, so they are never guaranteed to be exact. Their purpose is to estimate the result row count and cost of execution plan steps. You can never use them as proof. Yours, Laurenz Albe
Hi Laurenz,
Thanks for replying. I see. Can I maybe get accurate information if the column has an index? In other words, are there any type of indexes through which I can get the number of distinct values or the values themselves, without needing to scan the column?
Best,
Stefanos
From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Sent: Saturday, March 2, 2024 04:28
To: Baziotis, Stefanos <sb54@illinois.edu>; pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Guarantees/Semantics of pg_stats
Sent: Saturday, March 2, 2024 04:28
To: Baziotis, Stefanos <sb54@illinois.edu>; pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Guarantees/Semantics of pg_stats
On Sat, 2024-03-02 at 07:41 +0000, Baziotis, Stefanos wrote:
> I'm interested in learning more about the guarantees/semantics of pg_stats.
> For example, is there a guarantee that the n_distinct and most_common_vals
> fields will take into account any values appearing more than M times or
> maybe with frequence more than f? In what cases will n_distinct and
> most_common_vals will miss some values?
Table Statistics are not exact. They are collected from a random sample of
the data, so they are never guaranteed to be exact.
Their purpose is to estimate the result row count and cost of execution plan
steps. You can never use them as proof.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
> I'm interested in learning more about the guarantees/semantics of pg_stats.
> For example, is there a guarantee that the n_distinct and most_common_vals
> fields will take into account any values appearing more than M times or
> maybe with frequence more than f? In what cases will n_distinct and
> most_common_vals will miss some values?
Table Statistics are not exact. They are collected from a random sample of
the data, so they are never guaranteed to be exact.
Their purpose is to estimate the result row count and cost of execution plan
steps. You can never use them as proof.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
On Sat, 2024-03-02 at 22:29 +0000, Baziotis, Stefanos wrote: > Can I maybe get accurate information if the column has an index? In other words, > are there any type of indexes through which I can get the number of distinct > values or the values themselves, without needing to scan the column? No. Yours, Laurenz Albe