Обсуждение: Checking MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_WAL_SUMMARIES
Hi hackers,
during reading the source code of new incremental backup functionality
I noticed that the following condition can by unintentional:
/*
* For newer server versions, likewise create pg_wal/summaries
*/
if (PQserverVersion(conn) < MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_WAL_SUMMARIES)
{
...
if (pg_mkdir_p(summarydir, pg_dir_create_mode) != 0 &&
errno != EEXIST)
pg_fatal("could not create directory \"%s\": %m", summarydir);
}
This is from src/bin/pg_basebackup/pg_basebackup.c.
Is the condition correct? Shouldn't it be ">=". Otherwise the function
will create "/summaries" only for older PostgreSQL versions.
I've attached a patch to fix it in case this is a typo.
--
Artur
Вложения
Hi,
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 03:11, Artur Zakirov <zaartur@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi hackers,
>
> during reading the source code of new incremental backup functionality
> I noticed that the following condition can by unintentional:
>
> /*
> * For newer server versions, likewise create pg_wal/summaries
> */
> if (PQserverVersion(conn) < MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_WAL_SUMMARIES)
> {
> ...
>
> if (pg_mkdir_p(summarydir, pg_dir_create_mode) != 0 &&
> errno != EEXIST)
> pg_fatal("could not create directory \"%s\": %m", summarydir);
> }
>
> This is from src/bin/pg_basebackup/pg_basebackup.c.
>
> Is the condition correct? Shouldn't it be ">=". Otherwise the function
> will create "/summaries" only for older PostgreSQL versions.
You seem right, nice catch. Also, this change makes the check in
snprintf(summarydir, sizeof(summarydir), "%s/%s/summaries",
basedir,
PQserverVersion(conn) < MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_PG_WAL ?
"pg_xlog" : "pg_wal");
redundant. PQserverVersion(conn) will always be higher than
MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_PG_WAL.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 01:11:27 +0100
Artur Zakirov <zaartur@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> during reading the source code of new incremental backup functionality
> I noticed that the following condition can by unintentional:
>
> /*
> * For newer server versions, likewise create pg_wal/summaries
> */
> if (PQserverVersion(conn) < MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_WAL_SUMMARIES)
> {
> ...
>
> if (pg_mkdir_p(summarydir, pg_dir_create_mode) != 0 &&
> errno != EEXIST)
> pg_fatal("could not create directory \"%s\": %m", summarydir);
> }
>
> This is from src/bin/pg_basebackup/pg_basebackup.c.
>
> Is the condition correct? Shouldn't it be ">=". Otherwise the function
> will create "/summaries" only for older PostgreSQL versions.
>
> I've attached a patch to fix it in case this is a typo.
I also think it should be ">="
Also, if so, I don't think the check of MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_PG_WAL
in the block is required, because the directory name is always pg_wal
in the new versions.
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
>
> --
> Artur
--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 09:41, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote: > You seem right, nice catch. Also, this change makes the check in > > snprintf(summarydir, sizeof(summarydir), "%s/%s/summaries", > basedir, > PQserverVersion(conn) < MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_PG_WAL ? > "pg_xlog" : "pg_wal"); > > redundant. PQserverVersion(conn) will always be higher than > MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_PG_WAL. Thank you both for the comments. Indeed, that part now looks redundant. I've attached a patch to remove checking MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_PG_WAL. -- Artur
Вложения
Hi, On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 12:11, Artur Zakirov <zaartur@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 09:41, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote: > > You seem right, nice catch. Also, this change makes the check in > > > > snprintf(summarydir, sizeof(summarydir), "%s/%s/summaries", > > basedir, > > PQserverVersion(conn) < MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_PG_WAL ? > > "pg_xlog" : "pg_wal"); > > > > redundant. PQserverVersion(conn) will always be higher than > > MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_PG_WAL. > > Thank you both for the comments. Indeed, that part now looks redundant. > I've attached a patch to remove checking MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_PG_WAL. Thanks for the update. The patch looks good to me. -- Regards, Nazir Bilal Yavuz Microsoft
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 03:11:40PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote: > Thanks for the update. The patch looks good to me. Yes, you're right. We want the opposite to happen here. I've applied the patch on HEAD. -- Michael