Обсуждение: A typo in a messsage?
I found the following message introduced by a recent commit.
> errdetail("The first unsummarized LSN is this range is %X/%X.",
Shouldn't the "is" following "LSN" be "in"?
diff --git a/src/backend/backup/basebackup_incremental.c b/src/backend/backup/basebackup_incremental.c
index 42bbe564e2..22b861ce52 100644
--- a/src/backend/backup/basebackup_incremental.c
+++ b/src/backend/backup/basebackup_incremental.c
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ PrepareForIncrementalBackup(IncrementalBackupInfo *ib,
tle->tli,
LSN_FORMAT_ARGS(tli_start_lsn),
LSN_FORMAT_ARGS(tli_end_lsn)),
- errdetail("The first unsummarized LSN is this range is %X/%X.",
+ errdetail("The first unsummarized LSN in this range is %X/%X.",
LSN_FORMAT_ARGS(tli_missing_lsn))));
}
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 1:50 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I found the following message introduced by a recent commit.
>
> > errdetail("The first unsummarized LSN is this range is %X/%X.",
>
> Shouldn't the "is" following "LSN" be "in"?
I think you're right, will push.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 1:50 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I found the following message introduced by a recent commit.
>
> > errdetail("The first unsummarized LSN is this range is %X/%X.",
>
> Shouldn't the "is" following "LSN" be "in"?
Pushed.
At Wed, 27 Dec 2023 13:34:50 +0700, John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote in > > Shouldn't the "is" following "LSN" be "in"? > > Pushed. At Wed, 27 Dec 2023 13:35:24 +0700, John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote in >> I think "crc" should be in all uppercase in general and a brief >> grep'ing told me that it is almost always or consistently used in >> uppercase in our tree. > I pushed this also. Thanks for pushing them! regads. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center