Обсуждение: BUG #17277: write past chunk when calling normalize() on an empty string
BUG #17277: write past chunk when calling normalize() on an empty string
От
PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 17277
Logged by: Matthijs van der Vleuten
Email address: postgresql@zr40.nl
PostgreSQL version: 14.0
Operating system: Debian sid
Description:
When calling normalize(''), that is, on an empty string, a warning is
raised: "problem in alloc set ExprContext: detected write past chunk end".
I believe this is due to an error in unicode_norm.c. In unicode_normalize(),
when recompose is true (that is, when using NFC or NFKC normalization) the
loop on line 498 will iterate once before checking count < decomp_size. When
the input is an empty string, this would cause a write outside of the memory
allocated for recomp_chars.
Reproduction:
zr40@[local]:5432 ~=# select version();
version
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
PostgreSQL 14.0 (Debian 14.0-1.pgdg+1) on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by
gcc (Debian 10.3.0-11) 10.3.0, 64-bit
(1 row)
zr40@[local]:5432 ~=# select normalize('');
WARNING: problem in alloc set ExprContext: detected write past chunk end in
block 0x55793d119620, chunk 0x55793d1196a8
WARNING: problem in alloc set ExprContext: detected write past chunk end in
block 0x55793d119620, chunk 0x55793d1196a8
normalize
───────────
(1 row)
Re: BUG #17277: write past chunk when calling normalize() on an empty string
От
Michael Paquier
Дата:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 09:55:08PM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> When calling normalize(''), that is, on an empty string, a warning is
> raised: "problem in alloc set ExprContext: detected write past chunk end".
Well, direct callers of unicode_normalize_kc() in ~12 would have the
same problem because this code was not written with this case in mind
as far as I recall, after looking at the git history (60f11b8) as
pg_saslprep() does not allow the case of empty passwords.
> I believe this is due to an error in unicode_norm.c. In unicode_normalize(),
> when recompose is true (that is, when using NFC or NFKC normalization) the
> loop on line 498 will iterate once before checking count < decomp_size. When
> the input is an empty string, this would cause a write outside of the memory
> allocated for recomp_chars.
No, the code does not take the recomposition loop in this case, but
the initialization of target_pos to 1 would cause recomp_chars to be
written past its allocation position by one byte.
As there could be callers of unicode_normalize[_kc]() outside core,
I'd rather fix that at the source and patch unicode_norm.c. One way
to do that would be to leave once you know that there is nothing to
decompose after the loop over decompose_code() and return decomp_chars
that would be set with an empty set of points, as per the attached.
There may be a point in issuing an error if there is an empty string,
though. Another thing would be to consider if is_normalized() should
return false for an empty string, but we have considered empty strings
as normalized since this has been released:
=# SELECT '' IS NFD NORMALIZED;
is_normalized
---------------
t
(1 row)
That feels more natural this way. Still, I can see some perl modules
that would return false for such a case, by the way. The
normalization docs don't seem to mention that directly, except for the
stream-safe text format:
https://www.unicode.org/faq/normalization.html
https://unicode.org/reports/tr15/tr15-51.html
--
Michael
Вложения
Re: BUG #17277: write past chunk when calling normalize() on an empty string
От
Michael Paquier
Дата:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 03:33:29PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > That feels more natural this way. Still, I can see some perl modules > that would return false for such a case, by the way. The > normalization docs don't seem to mention that directly, except for the > stream-safe text format: > https://www.unicode.org/faq/normalization.html > https://unicode.org/reports/tr15/tr15-51.html I have expanded the tests, and fixed this one as of 098c1345. Thanks for the report, Matthijs! -- Michael