Обсуждение: DISTINCT term in aggregate function

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

DISTINCT term in aggregate function

От
Pantelis Theodosiou
Дата:
Hi, I didn't think of including you in this suggestion.
Or the pdsql-docs was not the right list to post? I didn't want to mix it with the GROUP BY DISTINCT patch.

Please check my suggestion.

Best regards
Pantelis Theodosiou




---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Pantelis Theodosiou <ypercube@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 1:03 AM
Subject: Fwd: GROUP BY DISTINCT
To: <pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org>



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: GROUP BY DISTINCT
To: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>, Georgios Kokolatos <gkokolatos@protonmail.com>, <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>


Hi Vik,

The patch seems quite ready, I have just two comments.

1) Shouldn't this add another <indexterm> for DISTINCT, somewhere in the
documentation? Now the index points just to the SELECT DISTINCT part.

.....

regards

--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



After reading the above thread in hackers, I noticed that the index does not point to aggrgeate functions either and DISTINCT is not mentioned in the aggregate functions page either: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-aggregate.html
Shouldn't it be mentioned with an example of COUNT(DISTINCT ...)  or aggregate_function(DISTINCT ...) in general ?

Best regards

Pantelis Theodosiou

Re: DISTINCT term in aggregate function

От
Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Sorry, I'm not reading pgsql-docs very often, so I missed the post.
Yeah, we should probably add an indexterm to the other places too.

regards

On 3/18/21 7:03 PM, Pantelis Theodosiou wrote:
> Hi, I didn't think of including you in this suggestion.
> Or the pdsql-docs was not the right list to post? I didn't want to mix
> it with the GROUP BY DISTINCT patch.
> 
> Please check my suggestion.
> 
> Best regards
> Pantelis Theodosiou
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: *Pantelis Theodosiou* <ypercube@gmail.com <mailto:ypercube@gmail.com>>
> Date: Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 1:03 AM
> Subject: Fwd: GROUP BY DISTINCT
> To: <pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
> <mailto:pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org>>
> 
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: *Tomas Vondra* <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com
> <mailto:tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>>
> Date: Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:33 PM
> Subject: Re: GROUP BY DISTINCT
> To: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org
> <mailto:vik@postgresfriends.org>>, Georgios Kokolatos
> <gkokolatos@protonmail.com <mailto:gkokolatos@protonmail.com>>,
> <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
> <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>>
> Cc: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl <mailto:er@xs4all.nl>>
> 
> 
> Hi Vik,
> 
> The patch seems quite ready, I have just two comments.
> 
> 1) Shouldn't this add another <indexterm> for DISTINCT, somewhere in the
> documentation? Now the index points just to the SELECT DISTINCT part.
> 
> .....
> 
> regards
> 
> -- 
> Tomas Vondra
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com <http://www.enterprisedb.com>
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
> 
> 
> 
> After reading the above thread in hackers, I noticed that the index does
> not point to aggrgeate functions either and DISTINCT is not mentioned in
> the aggregate functions page
> either: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-aggregate.html
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-aggregate.html>
> Shouldn't it be mentioned with an example of COUNT(DISTINCT ...)  or
> aggregate_function(DISTINCT ...) in general ?
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Pantelis Theodosiou

-- 
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company