Обсуждение: Possible typos in the #12.1.1 examples

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

Possible typos in the #12.1.1 examples

От
PG Doc comments form
Дата:
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/textsearch-intro.html
Description:

SELECT title || ' ' ||  author || ' ' ||  abstract || ' ' || body AS
document
FROM messages
WHERE mid = 12;

Seems like here the example missed 'm' as an alias and a dot in the `where`
clause:
... messages m
... m.id = 12;


SELECT m.title || ' ' || m.author || ' ' || m.abstract || ' ' || d.body AS
document
FROM messages m, docs d
WHERE mid = did AND mid = 12;

Possibly, the example missed dots: 
... m.id = d.id AND m.id = 12;

Thanks!

Re: Possible typos in the #12.1.1 examples

От
Michael Paquier
Дата:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 03:38:01PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> Seems like here the example missed 'm' as an alias and a dot in the `where`
> clause:
> ... messages m
> ... m.id = 12;

This query is valid as-is.

> SELECT m.title || ' ' || m.author || ' ' || m.abstract || ' ' || d.body AS
> document
> FROM messages m, docs d
> WHERE mid = did AND mid = 12;
>
> Possibly, the example missed dots:
> ... m.id = d.id AND m.id = 12;

This one is actually valid as well, as long as both relations don't
use the same column names, but I can see your point to add the aliases
to the quals of the WHERE clause to bring more clarity.
--
Michael

Вложения

Re: Possible typos in the #12.1.1 examples

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
On Thu, Mar  5, 2020 at 04:45:23PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 03:38:01PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > Seems like here the example missed 'm' as an alias and a dot in the `where`
> > clause:
> > ... messages m
> > ... m.id = 12;
> 
> This query is valid as-is.
> 
> > SELECT m.title || ' ' || m.author || ' ' || m.abstract || ' ' || d.body AS
> > document
> > FROM messages m, docs d
> > WHERE mid = did AND mid = 12;
> > 
> > Possibly, the example missed dots: 
> > ... m.id = d.id AND m.id = 12;
> 
> This one is actually valid as well, as long as both relations don't
> use the same column names, but I can see your point to add the aliases
> to the quals of the WHERE clause to bring more clarity.

Agreed, alias added in all supported branches.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +