Обсуждение: BUG #16214: Settings is not copy

The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference:      16214
Logged by:          Michail Shurutov
Email address:      shurutov@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 11.6
Operating system:   Gentoo, RHEL
Description:

I downloaded and ulpoaded into local PostgreSQL instance demo database from
Postgres Professional: https://postgrespro.ru/education/demodb
Than I made copy as "CREATE DATABASE demo_small template demo", after this I
noticed:
postgres=# \c demo
   
You are now connected to database "demo" as user "postgres".
   
demo=# select name,setting from pg_settings where name = 'search_path';
   
    name     |     setting
   
-------------+------------------
   
 search_path | bookings, public
   
(1 row)
   

   
demo=# \c demo_small
   
You are now connected to database "demo_small" as user "postgres".
   
demo_small=# select name,setting from pg_settings where name =
'search_path';   
    name     |     setting
   
-------------+-----------------
   
 search_path | "$user", public
   
(1 row)
   

   
demo_small=# \q

Parameter "search_path" was not copied.

And command "ALTER DATABASE" was not in included into dump made by
pg_dump:
mshurutov@desktop fromarch $ sudo -u postgres pg_dump -C demo_small >
/var/tmp/demo_small.sql
mshurutov@desktop fromarch $ grep "ALTER DATABASE" demo-small-20170815.sql
ALTER DATABASE demo SET search_path = bookings, public;
ALTER DATABASE demo SET bookings.lang = ru;
mshurutov@desktop fromarch $ grep "ALTER DATABASE" /var/tmp/demo_small.sql

ALTER DATABASE demo_small OWNER TO postgres;
mshurutov@desktop fromarch $

PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> Than I made copy as "CREATE DATABASE demo_small template demo", after this I
> noticed:
> ...
> Parameter "search_path" was not copied.

CREATE DATABASE is not defined to copy database-level properties,
only the contents of the database.  As it says in the manual,
this is not really intended as a general-purpose database copying
command in the first place.  For its intended purpose, copying
database-level properties wouldn't be particularly desirable.
Certainly you wouldn't want it to clone the database's ownership
or ACL.

            regards, tom lane