Обсуждение: BUG #16139: Assertion fails on INSERT into a postgres_fdw' table with two AFTER INSERT triggers
BUG #16139: Assertion fails on INSERT into a postgres_fdw' table with two AFTER INSERT triggers
От
PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 16139
Logged by: Alexander Lakhin
Email address: exclusion@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 12.1
Operating system: Ubuntu 18.04
Description:
The following script:
CREATE EXTENSION postgres_fdw;
CREATE SERVER loopback FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER postgres_fdw OPTIONS (dbname
'postgres');
CREATE USER MAPPING FOR CURRENT_USER SERVER loopback;
CREATE TABLE loc2 (f1 int);
CREATE FOREIGN TABLE rem2 (f1 int) SERVER loopback OPTIONS(table_name
'loc2');
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION trigger_data() RETURNS trigger
LANGUAGE plpgsql AS 'begin return NEW; end;';
CREATE TRIGGER trigger1 AFTER INSERT ON rem2 FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE
trigger_data();
CREATE TRIGGER trigger2 AFTER INSERT ON rem2 FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE
trigger_data();
INSERT INTO rem2 VALUES(1);
raises the assertion:
Core was generated by `postgres: law regression [local] INSERT
'.
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
#0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51
51 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt
#0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51
#1 0x00007fd866e97801 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
#2 0x000055c2cfc2f022 in ExceptionalCondition (
conditionName=conditionName@entry=0x55c2cfdaa228 "!(!(((slot)->tts_flags
& (1 << 1)) != 0))",
errorType=errorType@entry=0x55c2cfc86108 "FailedAssertion",
fileName=fileName@entry=0x55c2cfdc7e3b "execTuples.c",
lineNumber=lineNumber@entry=1620) at assert.c:54
#3 0x000055c2cf99380f in ExecFetchSlotHeapTuple
(slot=slot@entry=0x55c2d03b2bc8, materialize=materialize@entry=true,
shouldFree=shouldFree@entry=0x7ffd86cf260e) at execTuples.c:1620
#4 0x000055c2cf9609b7 in AfterTriggerExecute
(estate=estate@entry=0x55c2d039dd88, event=event@entry=0x55c2d03c0b7c,
relInfo=relInfo@entry=0x55c2d039e028,
trigdesc=trigdesc@entry=0x55c2d039e140, finfo=finfo@entry=0x55c2d039e300,
instr=instr@entry=0x0, per_tuple_context=0x55c2d03c2a50,
trig_tuple_slot1=0x55c2d03b2bc8,
trig_tuple_slot2=0x55c2d03b2c60) at trigger.c:4259
#5 0x000055c2cf960fa5 in afterTriggerInvokeEvents
(events=events@entry=0x55c2d034ebf8, firing_id=1,
estate=estate@entry=0x55c2d039dd88, delete_ok=delete_ok@entry=false) at
trigger.c:4540
#6 0x000055c2cf966876 in AfterTriggerEndQuery
(estate=estate@entry=0x55c2d039dd88) at trigger.c:4851
#7 0x000055c2cf986c53 in standard_ExecutorFinish (queryDesc=0x55c2d02edbc8)
at execMain.c:439
#8 0x000055c2cf986c74 in ExecutorFinish
(queryDesc=queryDesc@entry=0x55c2d02edbc8) at execMain.c:407
#9 0x000055c2cfb08771 in ProcessQuery (plan=plan@entry=0x55c2d03ac3d0,
sourceText=0x55c2d02ca3d8 "INSERT INTO rem2 VALUES(1);", params=0x0,
queryEnv=0x0, dest=dest@entry=0x55c2d03abe70,
completionTag=completionTag@entry=0x7ffd86cf29e0 "INSERT 0 1") at
pquery.c:203
#10 0x000055c2cfb088d2 in PortalRunMulti
(portal=portal@entry=0x55c2d0331498, isTopLevel=isTopLevel@entry=true,
setHoldSnapshot=setHoldSnapshot@entry=false,
dest=dest@entry=0x55c2d03abe70, altdest=altdest@entry=0x55c2d03abe70,
completionTag=completionTag@entry=0x7ffd86cf29e0 "INSERT 0 1") at
pquery.c:1283
#11 0x000055c2cfb0977d in PortalRun (portal=portal@entry=0x55c2d0331498,
count=count@entry=9223372036854775807,
isTopLevel=isTopLevel@entry=true, run_once=run_once@entry=true,
dest=dest@entry=0x55c2d03abe70,
altdest=altdest@entry=0x55c2d03abe70, completionTag=0x7ffd86cf29e0
"INSERT 0 1") at pquery.c:796
#12 0x000055c2cfb05a2d in exec_simple_query (
query_string=query_string@entry=0x55c2d02ca3d8 "INSERT INTO rem2
VALUES(1);") at postgres.c:1215
#13 0x000055c2cfb079fd in PostgresMain (argc=<optimized out>,
argv=argv@entry=0x55c2d02f5598, dbname=<optimized out>,
username=<optimized out>) at postgres.c:4236
#14 0x000055c2cfa79e2d in BackendRun (port=port@entry=0x55c2d02eb9d0) at
postmaster.c:4437
#15 0x000055c2cfa7d0f3 in BackendStartup (port=port@entry=0x55c2d02eb9d0) at
postmaster.c:4128
#16 0x000055c2cfa7d40a in ServerLoop () at postmaster.c:1704
#17 0x000055c2cfa7e7fb in PostmasterMain (argc=3, argv=<optimized out>) at
postmaster.c:1377
#18 0x000055c2cf9d9d87 in main (argc=3, argv=0x55c2d02c4a30) at main.c:228
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 4:21 PM PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote: > The following script: > CREATE EXTENSION postgres_fdw; > CREATE SERVER loopback FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER postgres_fdw OPTIONS (dbname > 'postgres'); > CREATE USER MAPPING FOR CURRENT_USER SERVER loopback; > CREATE TABLE loc2 (f1 int); > CREATE FOREIGN TABLE rem2 (f1 int) SERVER loopback OPTIONS(table_name > 'loc2'); > CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION trigger_data() RETURNS trigger > LANGUAGE plpgsql AS 'begin return NEW; end;'; > > CREATE TRIGGER trigger1 AFTER INSERT ON rem2 FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE > trigger_data(); > CREATE TRIGGER trigger2 AFTER INSERT ON rem2 FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE > trigger_data(); > INSERT INTO rem2 VALUES(1); > > raises the assertion: Reproduced. Will look into this. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 5:20 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 4:21 PM PG Bug reporting form > <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote: > > The following script: > > CREATE EXTENSION postgres_fdw; > > CREATE SERVER loopback FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER postgres_fdw OPTIONS (dbname > > 'postgres'); > > CREATE USER MAPPING FOR CURRENT_USER SERVER loopback; > > CREATE TABLE loc2 (f1 int); > > CREATE FOREIGN TABLE rem2 (f1 int) SERVER loopback OPTIONS(table_name > > 'loc2'); > > CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION trigger_data() RETURNS trigger > > LANGUAGE plpgsql AS 'begin return NEW; end;'; > > > > CREATE TRIGGER trigger1 AFTER INSERT ON rem2 FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE > > trigger_data(); > > CREATE TRIGGER trigger2 AFTER INSERT ON rem2 FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE > > trigger_data(); > > INSERT INTO rem2 VALUES(1); > > > > raises the assertion: > > Reproduced. Will look into this. A bit of investigation showed that this is caused by commit ff11e7f4b9ae017585c3ba146db7ba39c31f209a. I haven't yet looked at the commit in any detail, though. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 8:35 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
> A bit of investigation showed that this is caused by commit
> ff11e7f4b9ae017585c3ba146db7ba39c31f209a. I haven't yet looked at the
> commit in any detail, though.
I spent some time studying the commit. I think AfterTriggerExecute()
should make sure that:
* foreign tables always use zero and save the tuple(s) to a
* tuplestore. AFTER_TRIGGER_FDW_FETCH directs AfterTriggerExecute() to
* retrieve a fresh tuple or pair of tuples from that tuplestore, while
* AFTER_TRIGGER_FDW_REUSE directs it to use the most-recently-retrieved
* tuple(s). This permits storing tuples once regardless of the number of
* row-level triggers on a foreign table.
But the commit modified that function to clear the tg_trigslot and
tg_newslot slots' contents, which are reused when
AFTER_TRIGGER_FDW_REUSE, as shown below:
@@ -4374,12 +4373,17 @@ AfterTriggerExecute(AfterTriggerEvent event,
heap_freetuple(rettuple);
/*
- * Release buffers
+ * Release resources
*/
- if (buffer1 != InvalidBuffer)
- ReleaseBuffer(buffer1);
- if (buffer2 != InvalidBuffer)
- ReleaseBuffer(buffer2);
+ if (should_free_trig)
+ heap_freetuple(LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuple);
+ if (should_free_new)
+ heap_freetuple(LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple);
+
+ if (LocTriggerData.tg_trigslot)
+ ExecClearTuple(LocTriggerData.tg_trigslot);
+ if (LocTriggerData.tg_newslot)
+ ExecClearTuple(LocTriggerData.tg_newslot);
Attached is a patch for fixing that. Maybe I'm missing something, though.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
Вложения
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 8:25 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 8:35 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
> > A bit of investigation showed that this is caused by commit
> > ff11e7f4b9ae017585c3ba146db7ba39c31f209a. I haven't yet looked at the
> > commit in any detail, though.
>
> I spent some time studying the commit.
Another minor thing I noticed about the commit is this:
@@ -4281,31 +4266,38 @@ AfterTriggerExecute(AfterTriggerEvent event,
* that is stored as a heap tuple, constructed in different memory
* context, in the slot anyway.
*/
- LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuple =
ExecFetchSlotHeapTuple(trig_tuple_slot1,
- true, NULL);
- LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
+ LocTriggerData.tg_trigslot = trig_tuple_slot1;
+ LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuple =
+ ExecFetchSlotHeapTuple(trig_tuple_slot1, true,
&should_free_trig);
+ LocTriggerData.tg_newslot = trig_tuple_slot2;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple =
((evtshared->ats_event & TRIGGER_EVENT_OPMASK) ==
TRIGGER_EVENT_UPDATE) ?
- ExecFetchSlotHeapTuple(trig_tuple_slot2, true, NULL) : NULL;
- LocTriggerData.tg_newtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
+ ExecFetchSlotHeapTuple(trig_tuple_slot2, true,
&should_free_new) : NULL;
break;
LocTriggerData.tg_newslot is always set to trig_tuple_slot2, but I
think we should set it to trig_tuple_slot2 if UPDATE, NULL otherwise,
to ensure that it's a NULL pointer if INSERT/DELETE, which I think
trigger-function authors would assume. So I updated the patch.
Attached is an updated version of the patch.
Other changes:
* The commit forgot to update the documentation on the trigger
interface, so I updated it (as such).
* I added a bit more regression test cases.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
Вложения
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 8:53 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
> Attached is an updated version of the patch.
I noticed that the patch I proposed has an issue for some cases. Let
me explain. I assumed that the slots trig_tuple_slot1 and
trig_tuple_slot2 passed to AfterTriggerExecute() are NULL if the
target table is not a foreign table, from thiscomment for that
function:
* trig_tuple_slot1: scratch slot for tg_trigtuple (foreign tables only)
* trig_tuple_slot2: scratch slot for tg_newtuple (foreign tables only)
but actually that's not true. Consider an example:
postgres=# create table t1 (a int, b int);
postgres=# create table t2 (a int, b int);
postgres=# create server loopback foreign data wrapper postgres_fdw
options (dbname 'postgres');
postgres=# create user MAPPING FOR CURRENT_USER server loopback ;
postgres=# create foreign table ft1 (a int, b int) server loopback
options (table_name 't1');
postgres=# insert into t1 values (1, 1);
postgres=# create trigger trig_row_after_foreign after insert or
update or delete on ft1 for each row execute procedure trigger_data
(23, 'skidoo');
postgres=# create trigger trig_row_after_regular after insert or
update or delete on t2 for each row execute procedure trigger_data
(23, 'skidoo');
postgres=# with moved_rows as (update ft1 set a = 2, b = 2 where a = 1
returning *) insert into t2 select * from moved_rows;
NOTICE: trig_row_after_foreign(23, skidoo) AFTER ROW UPDATE ON ft1
NOTICE: OLD: (1,1),NEW: (2,2)
NOTICE: trig_row_after_regular(23, skidoo) AFTER ROW INSERT ON t2
NOTICE: NEW: (2,2)
INSERT 0 1
For this query, when executing the trigger trig_row_after_regular
(trigger on a regular table!) by AfterTriggerExecute(), the caller of
that function passes to it non-NULL trig_tuple_slot1 and
trig_tuple_slot2 made for the previous trigger trig_row_after_foreign.
And this causes AfterTriggerExecute() to incorrectly skip clearing
tg_trigtuple and tg_newtuple at the final step, because I made this
change to that function:
*** 4355,4364 **** AfterTriggerExecute(EState *estate,
if (should_free_new)
heap_freetuple(LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple);
! if (LocTriggerData.tg_trigslot)
! ExecClearTuple(LocTriggerData.tg_trigslot);
! if (LocTriggerData.tg_newslot)
! ExecClearTuple(LocTriggerData.tg_newslot);
/*
* If doing EXPLAIN ANALYZE, stop charging time to this trigger, and count
--- 4360,4373 ----
if (should_free_new)
heap_freetuple(LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple);
! /* don't clear slots' contents if foreign table */
! if (trig_tuple_slot1 == NULL)
! {
! if (LocTriggerData.tg_trigslot)
! ExecClearTuple(LocTriggerData.tg_trigslot);
! if (LocTriggerData.tg_newslot)
! ExecClearTuple(LocTriggerData.tg_newslot);
! }
To fix, I propose to modify the caller (ie,
afterTriggerInvokeEvents()) so that it sets the passed-in slots
trig_tuple_slot1 and trig_tuple_slot2 to NULL if the target table is
not a foreign table. Attached is an updated patch for that. I also
added the commit message. If no objections, I'll push the patch.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
Вложения
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:27 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote: > If no objections, I'll push the patch. Pushed. Thanks for the report, Alexander Lakhin! Best regards, Etsuro Fujita