Обсуждение: pg_config docs?
Where do we document the pg_config SQL function?
test=> \df pg_config
List of functions
Schema | Name | Result data type | Argument data types | Type
------------+-----------+------------------+---------------------------------+------
pg_catalog | pg_config | SETOF record | OUT name text, OUT setting text | func
I can't find it.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Where do we document the pg_config SQL function?
We don't, because it's just the infrastructure under the pg_config view.
regards, tom lane
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 05:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Where do we document the pg_config SQL function? > > We don't, because it's just the infrastructure under the pg_config view. OK, thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 05:45:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 05:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > > Where do we document the pg_config SQL function? > > > > We don't, because it's just the infrastructure under the pg_config view. > > OK, thanks. Uh, I listed it under "Functions" in the release notes. Is that the right place? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 05:45:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 05:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> We don't, because it's just the infrastructure under the pg_config view.
> Uh, I listed it under "Functions" in the release notes. Is that the
> right place?
If you mean the bit about its mutability marking, I wouldn't bother
listing that in the release notes at all. It's just a pro-forma change,
because the planner doesn't do anything differently with immutable SRFs.
regards, tom lane