Обсуждение: pg_config docs?
Where do we document the pg_config SQL function? test=> \df pg_config List of functions Schema | Name | Result data type | Argument data types | Type ------------+-----------+------------------+---------------------------------+------ pg_catalog | pg_config | SETOF record | OUT name text, OUT setting text | func I can't find it. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Where do we document the pg_config SQL function? We don't, because it's just the infrastructure under the pg_config view. regards, tom lane
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 05:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Where do we document the pg_config SQL function? > > We don't, because it's just the infrastructure under the pg_config view. OK, thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 05:45:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 05:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > > Where do we document the pg_config SQL function? > > > > We don't, because it's just the infrastructure under the pg_config view. > > OK, thanks. Uh, I listed it under "Functions" in the release notes. Is that the right place? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 05:45:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 05:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> We don't, because it's just the infrastructure under the pg_config view. > Uh, I listed it under "Functions" in the release notes. Is that the > right place? If you mean the bit about its mutability marking, I wouldn't bother listing that in the release notes at all. It's just a pro-forma change, because the planner doesn't do anything differently with immutable SRFs. regards, tom lane