Обсуждение: Table 28.4. wait_event description typo

Greetings, Pgsql-docs.

On monitoring statistic page [1] we have typo. Table 28.4. wait_event
description contains:

...
ClientRead  Waiting to read data from the client.
ClientWrite Waiting to write data from the client.
...
                                  ^^^^^
It should state TO CLIENT.
Thannks

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/monitoring-stats.html


-- 
Kind regards,
 Pavlo                          mailto:pavlo.golub@cybertec.at

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:12:29AM +0300, Pavlo Golub wrote:
> On monitoring statistic page [1] we have typo. Table 28.4. wait_event
> description contains:
>
> ...
> ClientRead  Waiting to read data from the client.
> ClientWrite Waiting to write data from the client.
> ...
>                                   ^^^^^
> It should state TO CLIENT.

Good catch.  It seems that this is my fault as what has been done in
6f3bd98.  So let's update the docs as you suggest, the attached does so
FWIW.
--
Michael

On 2018-May-30, Michael Paquier wrote:

> > ClientRead  Waiting to read data from the client.
> > ClientWrite Waiting to write data from the client.
> > ...
> >                                   ^^^^^
> > It should state TO CLIENT.
> 
> Good catch.  It seems that this is my fault as what has been done in
> 6f3bd98.  So let's update the docs as you suggest, the attached does so
> FWIW.

I do not think that patch does what you think it does.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 01:30:08PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I do not think that patch does what you think it does.

Oops.  Sorry another patch got on the way.  Here you go.
--
Michael

On 2018-May-30, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 01:30:08PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I do not think that patch does what you think it does.
> 
> Oops.  Sorry another patch got on the way.  Here you go.

Okay, pushed.  Because of the sgml to xml conversion, it didn't apply to
pg10 cleanly.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 02:14:42PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Okay, pushed.  Because of the sgml to xml conversion, it didn't apply to
> pg10 cleanly.

Thanks Álvaro.
--
Michael