Обсуждение: Table order at FROM clause affects performance?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

Table order at FROM clause affects performance?

От
Eduard Català
Дата:
I have a strange performance issue, i think that is not possible:

Given this statement:

SELECT several_fields  FROM A, B, C WHERE  conditions
A, B are tables with several LEFT JOINS but they act as one subquery.

If I execute the select above:

SELECT several_fields  FROM A, B, C WHERE  conditions
Time: 30 secs
Cost: 1M


If I execute the same select (same parameters) but swapping A and B in the from clause:

SELECT several_fields  FROM B, A, C WHERE  conditions
Time: 19ms

Cost: 10k

The plan changes dramatically: I can't see why the order of FROM clause impacts directly on the query cost and plan. If this is possible, where i can read about it? I need to know how the order of FROM clause modifies the query plan.

Thanks in advance. This is my first post.

Eduard Català






Re: Table order at FROM clause affects performance?

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
=?UTF-8?Q?Eduard_Catal=C3=A0?= <eduard.catala@gmail.com> writes:
> Given this statement:

> SELECT *several_fields*  FROM A, B, C WHERE  *conditions*
> A, B are tables with several LEFT JOINS but they act as one subquery.

You really can't expect useful help if you are going to pose questions
that abstract.  You have removed details that count, and made assumptions
that don't necessarily hold (e.g., what does "act as one subquery" mean?)

Probably the most likely bet, on this limited information, is that there
are enough base tables hidden inside your query that you're running into
join_collapse_limit and/or from_collapse_limit, resulting in the planner
failing to investigate the best available plan in one case.  Raising those
limits would help, if so.  But it could easily be something else.

There's some suggestions here about how to ask useful questions:

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Slow_Query_Questions

            regards, tom lane


Re: Table order at FROM clause affects performance?

От
Eduard Català
Дата:
Yes... i can't exepct useful help with my poor explanation 
but your aproach is the right answer! 

We were limited with from_collapse_limit. 

Cost now is: 112

Many many thanks.





On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Eduard Català <eduard.catala@gmail.com> writes:
> Given this statement:

> SELECT *several_fields*  FROM A, B, C WHERE  *conditions*
> A, B are tables with several LEFT JOINS but they act as one subquery.

You really can't expect useful help if you are going to pose questions
that abstract.  You have removed details that count, and made assumptions
that don't necessarily hold (e.g., what does "act as one subquery" mean?)

Probably the most likely bet, on this limited information, is that there
are enough base tables hidden inside your query that you're running into
join_collapse_limit and/or from_collapse_limit, resulting in the planner
failing to investigate the best available plan in one case.  Raising those
limits would help, if so.  But it could easily be something else.

There's some suggestions here about how to ask useful questions:

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Slow_Query_Questions

                        regards, tom lane