Обсуждение: pgsql: Add casts from jsonb
Add casts from jsonb Add explicit cast from scalar jsonb to all numeric and bool types. It would be better to have cast from scalar jsonb to text too but there is already a cast from jsonb to text as just text representation of json. There is no way to have two different casts for the same type's pair. Bump catalog version Author: Anastasia Lubennikova with editorization by Nikita Glukhov and me Review by: Aleksander Alekseev, Nikita Glukhov, Darafei Praliaskouski Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/0154d35a-24ae-f063-5273-9ffcdf1c7f2e@postgrespro.ru Branch ------ master Details ------- https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c0cbe00fee6d0a5e0ec72c6d68a035e674edc4cc Modified Files -------------- src/backend/utils/adt/jsonb.c | 175 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/include/catalog/catversion.h | 2 +- src/include/catalog/pg_cast.h | 9 ++ src/include/catalog/pg_proc.h | 16 ++++ src/test/regress/expected/jsonb.out | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++ src/test/regress/sql/jsonb.sql | 22 +++++ 6 files changed, 328 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Seems, I broke Windows again, it doesn't like this patch, see https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=whelk&dt=2018-03-29%2013%3A41%3A13 But I don't understand how it could be... Teodor Sigaev wrote: > Add casts from jsonb > > Add explicit cast from scalar jsonb to all numeric and bool types. It would be > better to have cast from scalar jsonb to text too but there is already a cast > from jsonb to text as just text representation of json. There is no way to have > two different casts for the same type's pair. > > Bump catalog version > > Author: Anastasia Lubennikova with editorization by Nikita Glukhov and me > Review by: Aleksander Alekseev, Nikita Glukhov, Darafei Praliaskouski > Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/0154d35a-24ae-f063-5273-9ffcdf1c7f2e@postgrespro.ru > > Branch > ------ > master > > Details > ------- > https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c0cbe00fee6d0a5e0ec72c6d68a035e674edc4cc > > Modified Files > -------------- > src/backend/utils/adt/jsonb.c | 175 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > src/include/catalog/catversion.h | 2 +- > src/include/catalog/pg_cast.h | 9 ++ > src/include/catalog/pg_proc.h | 16 ++++ > src/test/regress/expected/jsonb.out | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > src/test/regress/sql/jsonb.sql | 22 +++++ > 6 files changed, 328 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > -- Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
Hm, it was a random failure? Teodor Sigaev wrote: > Seems, I broke Windows again, it doesn't like this patch, see > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=whelk&dt=2018-03-29%2013%3A41%3A13 > > > But I don't understand how it could be... > > Teodor Sigaev wrote: >> Add casts from jsonb >> >> Add explicit cast from scalar jsonb to all numeric and bool types. It would be >> better to have cast from scalar jsonb to text too but there is already a cast >> from jsonb to text as just text representation of json. There is no way to have >> two different casts for the same type's pair. >> >> Bump catalog version >> >> Author: Anastasia Lubennikova with editorization by Nikita Glukhov and me >> Review by: Aleksander Alekseev, Nikita Glukhov, Darafei Praliaskouski >> Discussion: >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/0154d35a-24ae-f063-5273-9ffcdf1c7f2e@postgrespro.ru >> >> >> Branch >> ------ >> master >> >> Details >> ------- >> https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c0cbe00fee6d0a5e0ec72c6d68a035e674edc4cc >> >> Modified Files >> -------------- >> src/backend/utils/adt/jsonb.c | 175 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> src/include/catalog/catversion.h | 2 +- >> src/include/catalog/pg_cast.h | 9 ++ >> src/include/catalog/pg_proc.h | 16 ++++ >> src/test/regress/expected/jsonb.out | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> src/test/regress/sql/jsonb.sql | 22 +++++ >> 6 files changed, 328 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > -- Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> writes: > Hm, it was a random failure? Yeah, whelk seems to be a bit flaky lately. Not very clear why, but it's shown several failures that other BF members didn't. https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=whelk&br=HEAD Curiously, it's only HEAD that's flapping; the back branches are fine. regards, tom lane