Обсуждение: Speed of win32 port vs cygwin...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

Speed of win32 port vs cygwin...

От
Ati Rosselet
Дата:
We have a linux laptop that refuses to connect to the projector, so I
downloaded the win32 snapshot (this morning) and installed it under
winXP.  Everything works fine... except for the speed. some queries tokk
significantly (read ~5 minutes) longer than what I got after giving up
and installing the cygwin version.  Is there any reason for this?  It
seemed to especially slow down when using large selects with IN () where
the items in the IN clause used accented characters.  (large selects
means multiple joins on multiple tables).

Have there been any speed tests done, and if so, what's the status?
--
_____________________________________________________
 Ati Rosselet



Re: Speed of win32 port vs cygwin...

От
"Merlin Moncure"
Дата:
Ati wrote:
> We have a linux laptop that refuses to connect to the projector, so I
> downloaded the win32 snapshot (this morning) and installed it under
> winXP.  Everything works fine... except for the speed. some queries
tokk
> significantly (read ~5 minutes) longer than what I got after giving up
> and installing the cygwin version.  Is there any reason for this?  It
> seemed to especially slow down when using large selects with IN ()
where
> the items in the IN clause used accented characters.  (large selects
> means multiple joins on multiple tables).
>
> Have there been any speed tests done, and if so, what's the status?

This may be a 7.4/7.5 issue, not a win32 issue.  Compare the query
plains from explain and look for differences.  Remember, you are running
a pre-beta 7.5.  It would be really helpful if you could compare your
queries on non-win32 7.5devel version.

Try sending results of explain in both versions.

Merlin

Re: Speed of win32 port vs cygwin...

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
Ati Rosselet <ati.rosselet@clarmont.hu> writes:
> It seemed to especially slow down when using large selects with IN ()
> where the items in the IN clause used accented characters.

Hm, perhaps Windows has a particularly awful implementation of strcoll()?

> Have there been any speed tests done, and if so, what's the status?

AFAIK no one has yet gotten to that; the focus so far has been on
stabilizing the port.  But it's probably about time to start learning
about performance issues.

            regards, tom lane