Обсуждение: [pgsql-pkg-yum] postgis24_96 replaces postgis2_96, causing issues
Hi there, Recently in rhel-7-x86_64, postgis24_96 replaced postgis2_96 by obsoleting the latter meta-package, instead of adding a postgis2_96-2.4.0 package. Because some of our Geo services had version locks on postgres and postgis2_96, this has caused a number of problems in those services that colleagues are mitigating right now. Is it possible to get a postgis2_96-2.4.0 and to revert so that postgis24_96 does not replace postgis2_96? Best regards, Jimmy -- Jimmy Angelakos Senior Software Engineer EDINA Argyle House 3 Lady Lawson Street Edinburgh EH3 9DR Tel: +44 (0)131 651 1557 The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. -- Sent via pgsql-pkg-yum mailing list (pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-pkg-yum
Hi Jimmy, On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 15:44 +0100, Jimmy Angelakos wrote: > Recently in rhel-7-x86_64, postgis24_96 replaced postgis2_96 by > obsoleting the latter meta-package, instead of adding a > postgis2_96-2.4.0 package. > > Because some of our Geo services had version locks on postgres and > postgis2_96, this has caused a number of problems in those services that > colleagues are mitigating right now. Is it possible to get a > postgis2_96-2.4.0 and to revert so that postgis24_96 does not replace > postgis2_96? Unfortunately, we can't revert that change, because we already started supporting more than 1 PostGIS version for many of PG releases :( Regards, -- Devrim Gündüz EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
On 05/10/17 01:58, Devrim Gündüz wrote: > Hi Jimmy, > > On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 15:44 +0100, Jimmy Angelakos wrote: >> Recently in rhel-7-x86_64, postgis24_96 replaced postgis2_96 by >> obsoleting the latter meta-package, instead of adding a >> postgis2_96-2.4.0 package. >> >> Because some of our Geo services had version locks on postgres and >> postgis2_96, this has caused a number of problems in those services that >> colleagues are mitigating right now. Is it possible to get a >> postgis2_96-2.4.0 and to revert so that postgis24_96 does not replace >> postgis2_96? > Unfortunately, we can't revert that change, because we already started > supporting more than 1 PostGIS version for many of PG releases :( > > Regards, Thanks Devrim, I've advised them to select the most specific package versions instead of generic ones from now on. Cheers, Jimmy -- Jimmy Angelakos Senior Software Engineer EDINA Argyle House 3 Lady Lawson Street Edinburgh EH3 9DR Tel: +44 (0)131 651 1557 The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. -- Sent via pgsql-pkg-yum mailing list (pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-pkg-yum