Обсуждение: [GENERAL] Difficult while acquiring LWLocks

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

[GENERAL] Difficult while acquiring LWLocks

От
hariprasath nallasamy
Дата:
Hi all
   There is an use case, where i want some 10 LightWeight Locks and after 9.6 LW locks api's (LWLockAssign) are changed a bit and i am confused too.

 Only reference i cant get was from pg_stat_statement :(

Since GetNamedLWLockTranche method will return the base address of the specified tranche.

From pg_init
" RequestNamedLWLockTranche("Some_10_LWLocks", 10); "


For getting those locks which were requested from pg_init
" LWLockPadded *lwLockPadded = GetNamedLWLockTranche("Some_10_LWLocks");
   LWLock *lock = &(lwLockPadded[index in 0 to 9]).lock; "


Is the above code snippet a valid for requesting some 10 LWLocks?


TIA
 harry

Re: [GENERAL] Difficult while acquiring LWLocks

От
Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
On 03/05/2017 13:08, hariprasath nallasamy wrote:
> Hi all
>    There is an use case, where i want some 10 LightWeight Locks and
> after 9.6 LW locks api's (LWLockAssign) are changed a bit and i am
> confused too.
>
>  Only reference i cant get was from pg_stat_statement :(
>
> Since GetNamedLWLockTranche method will return the base address of the
> specified tranche.
>
> From pg_init
> *" RequestNamedLWLockTranche("Some_10_LWLocks", 10); "
>
>
> *For getting those locks which were requested from pg_init
> *" LWLockPadded *lwLockPadded = GetNamedLWLockTranche("Some_10_LWLocks");
>    LWLock *lock = &(lwLockPadded[index in 0 to 9]).lock; "*
>
> Is the above code snippet a valid for requesting some 10 LWLocks?
>
>

AFAIK yes this is the correct way to use multiple lwlocks.

--
Julien Rouhaud
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org


Re: [GENERAL] Difficult while acquiring LWLocks

От
hariprasath nallasamy
Дата:

AFAIK yes this is the correct way to use multiple lwlocks.

Thanks.!

Just curious, Is there any other way to do this.? 

Re: [GENERAL] Difficult while acquiring LWLocks

От
Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
On 03/05/2017 15:01, hariprasath nallasamy wrote:
>
>     AFAIK yes this is the correct way to use multiple lwlocks.
>
>
> Thanks.!
>
> Just curious, Is there any other way to do this.?

Probably no, except asking for 10 different tranches :)

--
Julien Rouhaud
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org